| THE ILLUSTRATED STANDARD OF THE GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG
(a comparison of three common types) |
 |
| The standard for the German Shepherd Dog, while annoyingly vague in many
respects, has not changed appreciably over the years. Unfortunately, the
same cannot be said of the breed. From the 1940’s, when most dogs in most
countries looked pretty much the same, we now have West German show, West
German working, East German, Czechoslovakian, English Alsation, American
show and probably others yet in the making. Partly this is due to a natural,
genetic diversification of families, and is probably a good thing. Related
dogs tend to look alike. Partly it’s due to legitimate differences in
breeders’ preferences. Working line breeders, for instance, will tend to put
less emphasis on movement than on drive. But in many cases it’s just
ignorance of what correct conformation is all about. The short legs and long
bodies of the Alsation were simply not efficient. Neither are the extreme
rear angulation and sloping toplines of American show dogs, nor the roached
backlines of West German show dogs. These faults have never been acceptable
under the standard, but somehow they became fashionable in their respective
countries and have been promoted by “big” breeders and judges alike.
|
| |
| Dog A Illustrations (A) |
|
|
| |
|
Dog A illustrates correctness, standing four square (with the hind feet
placed under the hip joint), standing show posed and moving at a flying
trot. This dog shows correct proportions of 10:8.75; slightly longer than
tall. This is measured from the top of the scapula (including muscling) to
the floor, and from the tip of the breast bone to the rear projection of the
pelvis. This dog shows a strong head with parallel planes, a deep skull
(measured from the top of the head to the underline of the jaw), and a
muzzle no longer than the length of the skull (from the back of the skull to
the corner of the eye). The neck is arched and is wide at the base, because
of the well laid back scapula. The head is carried generally erect, at about
a 45 degree angle.
The scapula is attached to a long upper arm at somewhat more than 90
degrees. It is not necessary for the shoulder to form a right angle, because
when the dog is moving, its centre of gravity will drop, lowering the body
slightly and causing the shoulder angle to close. Straight, upright bones
are optimal for support, but angulation is necessary for movement. About 95
degrees is the best compromise for both. Besides, reach is not limited by
the scapular angle, as it has no bony attachment. A very fit dog with this
lay back of shoulder can reach further than 45 degrees when necessary.
The upper arm, lower arm, femur or upper thigh, and gaskin or lower
thigh, are all equal in length. These are the levers that provide
propulsion, and the smoothest, most efficient propulsion is provided by
levers of equal length. The scapula is generally not as long as these bones,
as it is not a true lever. It pivots on its centre point, being pulled
forwards and backwards by massive layers of muscle across its entire
surface. It is more important that it be wide, to provide roomy attachment
for those muscles. Short forelegs are less vulnerable to injury, but they
are less effective at propelling the body. Very long legs are a feature of
racing dogs, but are much more vulnerable, particularly in jumping. The
medium length leg is the best all around compromise for speed, strength and
propulsion.
The pastern is only slightly angled. The more angled it is, the less
absorption it has, a bit like soft shocks on a car. A strong pastern has
great absorption, but can also generate propulsive energy. As the foot
travels back in the stride, the tendons are stretched like elastics over the
back of the joint, gathering energy for when the foot leaves the ground when
they snap back and giving the stride an extra bit of spring.
The back is level when standing normally, and slightly sloped when posed.
The withers must be long and high, flowing up into an arched neck and back
over a straight back, as this is where the long muscles that move the
scapula are found. In a normal spine, the vertebrae are strung together in a
straight line, while the long upper spines of each vertebra describe a high
arch at the withers, and a longer, lower arch over the lumbar region, with a
slight dip in between. In a well muscled dog, this dip is not visible, while
the lumbar arch should only be apparent as an arching of the muscles of the
loin.
The rib cage reaches well back to the centre of the dog, and balloons out
only slightly behind the forequarters. It should be flat relative to, say, a
pitbull or Rottweiler, but well enough rounded to provide ample heart and
lung capacity. If the ribs are well rounded, the sternum will only reach to
a point an inch or two above the elbows. Chest muscling will bring the
brisket to the point of elbow or slightly below, and hair will seem to
increase the chest depth even more. Maximum body depth should be at the
elbow, with the underline sloping upwards into the belly.
The pelvis is set at about 30 to 35 degrees, measured from a plane laid
across its top. I find this more accurate than trying to eyeball a line
through it. This angle is common to most big predators, and is the most
efficient angle to channel the upwards energy from each stride, forward
horizontally along the spine. The croup will generally follow the line of
the pelvis, but its length will depend on the lay of the caudal vertebrae at
the root of the tail. Whether the tail is high or low set has no effect on
gait, so a long croup is really more esthetic than practical. On the other
hand, a pelvis that is too steep or flat will result in a shortened stride
as well as a faulty croup. A flat pelvis hampers reach while a steep pelvis
restricts follow-through, and a dog will tend not to reach ahead any more
than he can follow-through (this is true for the forehand as well as the
rearhand). A long, smooth croup that flows into a beautiful saber tail is
certainly the most visually appealing finish to a fine moving dog. However,
it should be remembered that a very strong minded, dominant dog will often
carry its tail high, shortening the croup somewhat. Given a choice between a
weak minded dog with low tail carriage and a strong dog who flags his tail,
the choice should always be the latter.
Rear angulation has been the source of a great deal of contention in the
breed. Show animals have more of it, and working breds tend to have less.
American dogs have taken it to the extreme, to the point where no animal who
is not ridiculously over endowed will achieve top conformation ranking.
German show dogs are more reasonably structured, but even some of those are
starting to show excessive rear. Almost as a form of rebellion, many working
breds have so little that their stride at the trot is almost terrier-like.
Correct stifle angulation should mirror the shoulder, being somewhat greater
than 90 degrees, and for the same reasons. The dog will in all postures
stand up on its toes, and its metatarsus or hock will be parallel to its
upper thigh. This is also the typical configuration of most predatory
animals, where long term, low to medium speed and great endurance is
required, with occasional bursts of short term, extreme speed.
In movement, Dog A shows length of stride, power and suspension.
His head is at about 45 degrees, not straining up or down, while his
neckline flows down through long, strong, medium high withers, over a short,
straight, level backline with no arching or dipping, and down over a gently
sloping croup. Because of the sloping withers and croup, there is the
appearance of a slight slope to the topline, even though the spine is level.
He shows a 45 degree reach with a well opened shoulder. In the rear, he
under-reaches to his centre of gravity with only the toes touching down, not
the hocks. When driving back, he shows a 45 degree, snapping rear
follow-through with straightened hocks, tight Achilles tendon and a gaskin
that is not parallel to the ground. There is no flipping up of the pasterns,
or dragging of the rear toes. The effect is of a moderately low, sweeping,
efficient gait, with a period of suspension propelling the body effortlessly
through space, and making it appear to hover. When other dogs must shift
into a gallop, this dog can just stretch out into a longer stride and a
longer period of suspension, giving a beautiful illusion of slow motion.
|
| |
| Dog A Illustrations (b) |
|
|
| |
|
Dog B is an animal that probably could not win in any conformation arena,
yet this dog could work perfectly well at any task, and show decent speed,
strength and endurance. His proportions are 10:9.1, almost square. His
relatively short body and long legs make him athletic and quick, but will
tend to make him a galloper rather than a trotter, and will deny him the
grace and suppleness of a longer body.
His muzzle is too short, and a bit upturned, but his grip would be very
strong. His neck does not have a wide breadth of attachment, because of his
straighter shoulder. This is accompanied by a short, upright upper arm, and
his breastbone and forechest are not well developed. At a trot, this dog
will not be able to reach past his chin, and will be choppy in movement, but
in all likelihood he will still show good reach at the gallop, as both
forelegs are drawn forward in tandem with maximum exertion. Where he may
show problems is in coming down off very high jumps, such as a French
palisade, when a straight shoulder will not absorb as much of the tremendous
impact of landing as could a well laid on shoulder. I say could, because
fitness is such an important component of any physical activity. A very fit
dog with straight shoulders may perform better than a soft dog with good
shoulders. The fit, correct dog will perform the best of all. He also shows
rather upright pasterns, with very good feet. Unless the pastern is
completely straight, and risks buckling over on impact, an upright pastern
probably offers more absorptive capacity than a technically correct pastern.
The correct pastern is sufficiently sloped so that, no matter the angle of
impact, the joint will compress and there is no risk that the pastern will
be “jammed”.
This dog also lacks in chest depth, although its capacity is unaffected.
He will be slightly barrel chested, and as a result, will probably throw out
his elbows when gaiting. His shortness of body is reflected in a short
spine, which also shows a decided roach. His withers are flat, reducing the
area of attachment for shoulder muscles and forcing the scapula further
forward and down. This type of spinal configuration also has the tendency to
cause the dog to carry his head down, both standing and gaiting. His arching
spine has also forced his pelvis downward into a steep position, making a
long, driving follow-through more difficult and shortening the rear stride.
As well, his rear drive will accentuate his roach, in effect causing the
spine to buckle upwards, wasting a huge amount of energy and making the
spine more vulnerable to injury. A roach might be an advantage to a pack
animal whose back must bear weight, but it is of no particular advantage to
a working dog. Still, a roach is better then a sway back, and is less likely
to break down with pregnancy or age.
His hindquarters show angulation that is less than ideal, but which is
perfectly adequate for work. It is about the same amount as one sees in
wolves. His hock and upper thigh are parallel and well articulated, and what
his rear lacks in stride length it will make up in power. The front and rear
are balanced, and in most cases his flaws err on the side of strength. His
gait at a trot will be unimpressive, and in order to cover ground he must
shift into a flying trot at a relatively low rate of speed to make up for
his lack of stride. However, he is short coupled, dry and tightly ligamented,
and should show a normal ability to gallop and jump. While not an
outstanding specimen of the breed, he is perfectly serviceable, and should
be judged accordingly.
|
| |
| Dog A Illustrations (b) |
|
|
| |
|
Dog C is the extreme type of animal that can win top awards in the
American specialty show ring. His proportions are 10:8, which don’t sound
unreasonable, but in actuality creates a dog of unacceptable length. He
represents an evolution of the breed away from a body type that is athletic
and strong, towards one that shows an optically dramatic gait. The emphasis
on gait has resulted in a lack of attention to other problems and a
noticeable loss of breed type.
This dog’s head is small and weak, lacks good depth of stop, is too long
in foreface, and the skull lacks depth and jaw strength. The head has a
collie like quality which is atypical and weak. He has a straight front
assembly and associated short upper arm, and carries his head vertically
because of the steepness of the withers and backline. This neck also lacks
breadth of attachment, and is too long. The large prosternum and filled
forechest can give the illusion of a broad, well set shoulder. His lower arm
is a bit short, which contributes to his low station and low, sweeping gait,
but it is less efficient for galloping and jumping. The pasterns are down
and will probably collapse into a plantar position under the pressure of
landing off a high jump. The feet are flat. His withers are high, but more
because his hindquarters are low than because of their structure. The chest
is very deep, because it has been squashed flat, and is slab sided and
narrow when seen from the front. A tremendously long body means a very long
spine. It’s strong enough to give the dog an elegant topline, but is too
long for agility and jumping, and slopes unnaturally even when the dog is
standing informally. He has an underline and abdominal cavity which is long
and drooping, giving the abdominal organs far more space than they need. The
croup and tail are long and beautiful. Angulation in the stifle is
unbalanced with the angulation of the shoulder, being considerably more
acute: a full right angle. The lower hind leg has lengthened proportionately
much longer than the lower arm, pushing the hock downward and forming an
acute angle at the hock joint, known as sickle hocks. These are accompanied
by long, loose Achilles tendons which cannot snap the hock open for a sharp,
strong, propulsive follow-through.
In movement, Dog C gives the illusion of impressive stride and power. He
does show fine reach, because he is so loosely ligamented. Some show an
exaggerated reach, with the foreleg actually achieving an horizontal
position. A normally muscled front with good bone relationships can't do
this, at least not at a trot. The exaggerated rear angulation ostensibly
increases power and drive. What it actually does is produce an overextended
length of stride, which requires an excessively long back to absorb it. It
also gives the associated floppy, sickle (and probably cow) hocks that are
unable to completely snap open on follow-through, and that waste a great
deal of energy. The rear is lowered as a result, sloping not just the
topline, but the spine as well. An opened hock is achieved by speed, with
the hock thrown back and flipped open of its own momentum, but providing no
power. Hence the over fast gaiting at so many specialty shows. Loose,
excessive angles also prevent the dog from showing any period of suspension,
even at faster speeds. The hind leg has landed almost up to the hock
(plantar) before the forefoot is anywhere near leaving the ground. The dog
can’t generate sufficient power to lift and suspend the body. Needless to
say, this conformation is incapable of providing the power or coordination
necessary for fast galloping or athletic jumping.
The overall effect is of a very dramatic, even elegant, moving dog
(especially if it's in good condition), with a racy topline, huge stride and
great speed. The speed at which he is gaited makes the details inside the
silhouette difficult to see, and an extreme dog can appear very impressive.
He can even make a correct dog seem lacking, and will initially cover more
ground, faster and with more flash, leaving the correct dog behind. It would
take some time, longer than a few hours in a show ring, before the correct
dog's effortless, floating gait ran the extreme dog into the ground. Also,
the correct dog will show a normal walk, won’t stand on its hocks, can
gallop well and will have good jumping and turning ability, things that will
be more of a problem for this extreme dog.
Dogs D and E are compilations of actual dogs, showing an unfortunate
example of the divergence of type that has occurred. Dog D is an
amalgamation of two fine German imports, the Jims, Neuman’s and v Fiemereck.
Dog E is a combination of a US Grand Victor and a Best in Show winner. I
didn’t choose the best or worst of the photographs I used, just the elements
that showed the perspective I needed. As you can see, the first dog shows
strength of expression, normal angles and an appearance of power throughout.
The second dog makes obvious his weak ligamentation, fine bone, fragile head
and complete lack of expression and masculinity, all in the name of side
gait.
|
| |
 |
 |
| DOG D |
DOG E |
|
| |
|
TO VIEW
COMPARISON OF THIS DEMONSTRATION ABOVE AND TO COMPARE THE DIFFERENCE,
PLEASE CLICK HERE. |
| |
| Written by Linda Shaw MBA All Illustrations by
Linda Shaw |
 |
 |
| Please do not use our Health Matters website to attempt to diagnose or treat your pet. The consultation with your veterinarian is the best source of health advice for your individual pet. You should not rely, on the veterinary advice or any other information provided on this site for the diagnosis or treatment of any specific condition. You should always consult your own veterinarian for specific advice concerning the medical condition or general treatment of your pet. Günbil German shepherd dogs, worldclassgsd.com and or Günbil German shepherds, accepts no liability related to the veterinary advice and information provided on this site regarding health matters. |
|